Agree, if you aren't even trying to be "credibly decentralized" then there is a lot of value to on-chain dispute process that you can engage in to recover funds
Right now we sort of have "worst or both worlds" in that assets can be frozen, but no credible dispute process exists
re: the yETH hack:
at this point I actually really wish Circle/Coinbase would truly lean into something like ERC20-R with an appropriately well fleshed out (non-kangaroo-court) dispute resolution procedure etc.
no one is going to get a court order over $200k worth of cbETH or USDC, yet this can be a meaningful amount to whoever lost it
the asset is totally centralized, crypto broadly speaking is getting "fintech-ized" all over the place anyway
in light of these factors it should be possible to reverse an illicit transaction at relatively low-cost (lower than conventional U.S. court system) and without killing crypto's advertised benefits, but centralized asset issuers still demand court orders and haven't invested into ADR-based reversibility
Even better if it can be automated!
E.G. Circle can freeze a hacker's balance automatically in response to a hack, and then (later on) publish a merkle tree of the balances pre-hack
Then you can go in and prove your membership in that tree, burn it, and have tokens re-issued
1,407
7
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。