8t siden
$SOL | Solana is Resilient and Decentralized.
Here is why that matters as an investor:
🔸Risk mitigation -> Lowers volatility from outages/attacks
🔸Security -> Protects against centralization threats
🔸Growth potential -> Attracts capital and users
In essence, as an investor, choosing decentralized and resilient networks like Solana means aligning with assets that are built to endure market cycles, attract adoption, and deliver returns on investment.
If decentralization is weak, your investment could face existential risks.
Still not convinced Solana is decentralized after quoted thread?
Here are some additional metrics:
🔸1,295 Total Active Nodes (aggregated based on other sources: 1,982)
🔸Validators are spread across 78 countries (clusters in US, Europe and Asia)
🔸68% of validators run on diverse cloud providers, 25% on on-premises hardware, and 7% on AWS
🔸Nakamoto Coefficient of 23 (based on the top 23 validators controlling 33% of stake)
Solana exemplifies effective decentralization by maintaining a low AWS dependency, achieving zero throughput impact during outages, and sustaining 100% uptime.
Therefore $SOL is and remains my number 1 altcoin investment.
9t siden
$SOL | Solana's Resilience During AWS Outages
Have you ever wondered why some blockchains stop working during cloud problems?
It's not just bad luck: it's centralization.
Diving into fresh data from AWS Blockchain Tracker on blockchain reliance on @awscloud.
Spoiler: It's worse than you think.
EVERY network with >40% AWS dependency saw significant performance degradation during outages. There is a strong correlation between centralizing infrastructure (hello, AWS) and vulnerability.
Decentralization isn't optional; it's survival.
Solana leads with a Resilience Index of 97.6. Solana 's low dependency (<20% per report metrics) meant zero major disruptions during the last three AWS events. TX throughput? Held steady at 2k+ TPS. This isn't luck; it's smart infra: Multi-cloud + on-chain optimizations.
If you're building or investing, study @solana's Multi-Cloud strategy.
Layer 2s average 46.7% (!) AWS dependency. 2.2x higher than L1's 21.0%. @base has been flagged as a prime risk case, with a Centralization Risk of 16.3. 65%+ AWS exposure led to 40%+ downtime spikes.
Heavy AWS lean-in means one outage = chain-wide chaos.
Lesson for L2s: Diversify your infra or pay the price.
True decentralization starts with infra. Ditch the cloud monopolies where you can and explore multi-cloud, on-prem, or edge solutions.
Let's build tougher networks.
3,9k
14
Innholdet på denne siden er levert av tredjeparter. Med mindre annet er oppgitt, er ikke OKX forfatteren av de siterte artikkelen(e) og krever ingen opphavsrett til materialet. Innholdet er kun gitt for informasjonsformål og representerer ikke synspunktene til OKX. Det er ikke ment å være en anbefaling av noe slag og bør ikke betraktes som investeringsråd eller en oppfordring om å kjøpe eller selge digitale aktiva. I den grad generativ AI brukes til å gi sammendrag eller annen informasjon, kan slikt AI-generert innhold være unøyaktig eller inkonsekvent. Vennligst les den koblede artikkelen for mer detaljer og informasjon. OKX er ikke ansvarlig for innhold som er vert på tredjeparts nettsteder. Beholdning av digitale aktiva, inkludert stablecoins og NFT-er, innebærer en høy grad av risiko og kan svinge mye. Du bør nøye vurdere om handel eller innehav av digitale aktiva passer for deg i lys av din økonomiske tilstand.