Covalent and Chainlink are playing two different but complementary games.
Chainlink is the incumbent with oracles, CCIP, automation and big enterprise money flowing back into $LINK through a buyback and hold loop.
@Covalent_HQ is earlier but already hitting scale with 471M API calls in Q2 (95% paid), live $CXT buybacks (~1% retired), 300M staked (~33%), 98% already circulating and a burn on the way.
Chainlink brings offchain data onchain. Covalent streams onchain data offchain at sub 200ms, perfect for HFT bots and AI agents. With SOC2 compliance, 100+ chain coverage and 57k subs, it shows real demand now.
Chainlink owns today. But Covalent feels like the “GPU of blockchains,” with sharper reflexivity and much more asymmetry ahead. Same vibe I get from @peaq, infra that is already useful now but still early on the curve.
2.16万
2
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明，欧易不是所引用文章的作者，也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考，并不代表欧易观点，不作为任何形式的认可，也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下，此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章，了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险，其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况，仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。