米妮Minnie_OKX

"After watching your content, everything is under control" Minnie emphasizes that after receiving @, everyone gets a share 😂 Here’s a reminder for everyone, besides the [Creator Incentive], @OKX星球 also has a hidden benefit on the way 📩 🎁 Simply put: as long as your content is exciting enough, it doesn't matter the interaction rate, the number of likes, or the follower count! (Mention us in the comments so we can see) You have a chance to receive gifts from @OKX星球 Detailed event information here 👉 https://oyidl.me/ul/TSvG9ed Looking forward to seeing the excellent you, let's not miss any good ideas 📖

#三星罢工倒计时：KOSPI熔断，日损$7亿 Samsung chip workers strike, will AI computing power expansion be affected? 🔒 Locked on May 21, about 45,000 Samsung chip workers will start a full strike, with the HBM core production line expected to halt, causing a daily loss of about $700 million. KOSPI 200 futures directly triggered a -5% circuit breaker. Let's first take a deep dive into the related issues⬇️ Q: What is HBM❓ Why is it important❓ A: HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) is the core component of AI training chips like Nvidia's H100 and H200. Without HBM, a GPU is an incomplete chip. ➤ Currently, the global HBM market is dominated by Samsung and SK Hynix, together supplying over 90%. A shutdown of Samsung's HBM production line means a supply chain gap in the core components relied upon for global AI computing power expansion. Q: How does the transmission chain work❓ A: The supply shock won't immediately affect Nvidia's deliveries on day one; the chip supply chain has inventory buffers, usually lasting 4 to 8 weeks. ➤ But if the strike lasts more than a month, the following will happen⬇️ HBM production capacity declines → Nvidia GPU stock tightens → Data center delivery cycles lengthen → AI infrastructure construction delays → Cloud providers' computing power expansion plans are hindered Microsoft, Google, and Amazon's capital expenditure plans this year heavily depend on GPU delivery schedules; any delay will be reflected in their financial reports. What we need to watch is: how long the strike will last. Currently, the South Korean Prime Minister has held an emergency meeting, Chairman Lee Jae-yong has publicly apologized, and government-mandated mediation options are still on the table. Historically, large industrial strikes in South Korea last on average 2 to 3 weeks, but this time the union is tough, and negotiations have not made substantial progress yet. If the strike starts as scheduled on the 21st and lasts more than 4 weeks, the pressure on AI computing power supply will begin to show in the market by mid-June. The impact of this event won't be seen today, but the supply chain clock has already started ticking. Do you think this strike will disrupt the expansion pace of AI infrastructure?👇

Gather round🍕 Pizza Festival, meme creators hurry up‼️ The OKX Planet meme contest has begun, who will be the Pizza Festival "God of Abstraction"? Come create now～ Post with #OKXPizzaDay and @OKX星球, jokes, memes, Meme, abstract literature all welcome! Top quality content selected daily and pinned, plus USDT, OKX merchandise waiting for you 🚀 Event details🔗: https://oyidl.net/ul/nErPHA4 "$BTC "

Busy Wednesday / Exciting Wednesday / Wednesday much loved by Libra 😂 #OKXPizzaDay Lightly looking forward to the event!

#矿企Q1集体亏损转型AI求生 Mining companies collectively pivot to AI amid Q1 losses Are BTC hashrate security issues looming with miners shifting to AI? Q1 earnings season saw miners making their moves, all reporting losses 😂 ➤ MARA net loss $1.3B, CleanSpark net loss $378M, Keel net loss $145M All three coincidentally announced shifts to AI/HPC; mining is too tough, selling hashrate to AI firms is more lucrative 😅 🤨 What’s driving this shift? Mining revenue is shrinking, costs aren’t dropping. BTC price is underwater, network difficulty keeps rising, mined coins are fewer. Using the same facilities and power, serving AI companies is far more profitable than mining BTC. Changing direction is a rational choice, not a betrayal. ❓Q: Will this shift affect BTC hashrate security? ❗️A: No worries～ ➤ Currently, the shift to AI mainly involves old mining rigs that are high-cost and low-efficiency. Their hashrate exiting essentially cleans out inefficient capacity, leaving behind miners with lower costs and higher efficiency. Historically, when China banned mining entirely, the network hashrate halved overnight, yet BTC kept running, and hashrate fully recovered within two months. 👀 A drop in total hashrate doesn’t equal network security collapse. In fact, the real concern is that after miners exit, mining will concentrate increasingly in a few large, low-cost operators. Higher hashrate concentration = lower network decentralization This isn’t an immediate threat but a structural change worth monitoring long-term. Miners pivoting is market-driven elimination, not a doomsday signal for $BTC～👇

#TrumpRejectsIranPeacePlanAgain US-Iran talks break down, crude oil returns to $100—how will you adjust your positions? Trump said Iran's response is unacceptable. Iran said: We officially reject it! Vance flew to Islamabad, Kushner also went, after so many rounds of talks, the result was both sides just said "No" to each other and then flew home 😐 Turns out the end of diplomacy is crude oil at $100 📈 WTI crude oil opened 3% higher, returning to the $100 mark. US stock futures slightly down, gold $XAUT under pressure. The Strait of Hormuz blockade may continue into the second half—this is not a short-term disruption, but a macro backdrop that requires repricing. ➤ To sum up the current market situation in one sentence: everyone knows there is a problem, but no one knows when it will end. 🤨 How to think about positions in this environment Geopolitical conflicts persist, and the market is being pulled by two forces simultaneously: ➊ Risk appetite declines, capital wants to exit high-volatility assets, $BTC theoretically under pressure; ➋ Uncertainty in the fiat system rises, institutions increase demand for BTC as a hedge, on-chain data validates this logic. These two forces offset each other, direction is unclear. This itself is the answer: it’s neither the time to add positions nor to liquidate. This is called 【Strategic Idling】, sometimes idling is also a form of action 🙃 But no matter what you choose, one thing always holds true: when direction is unclear, position management takes priority over directional judgment. Not losing money is the only way to be qualified to wait for the day when the situation becomes clear～ Whether Vance will fly again, we don’t know. But position management needs to be thought through now. How do you plan to manage your positions? Leave your thoughts, still a prize in the comment section～👇

#Coinbase-Q1 net loss nearly $400 million Armstrong says this is growing pains of transformation 🤨 So, is he chasing trends or positioning himself? After the Q1 earnings release, COIN fell 6% in after-hours trading. Revenue was $1.41 billion, down 31% year-over-year, below expectations. Net loss was $394 million, including $482 million from unrealized losses on crypto assets. The numbers look pretty rough 😂, but what Armstrong said during the earnings call is quite insightful. ➤ What Armstrong is doing He calls Coinbase's new strategy "Everything Exchange" — not just buying and selling crypto, but integrating derivatives, futures, prediction markets, stocks, and commodities all on one platform. Their data is already validating this direction: annualized revenue from derivatives has surpassed $200 million, and prediction markets, just two months after launch, have reached $100 million in annualized revenue. On the surface, Coinbase’s moves look like chasing market trends—derivatives are hot, so they do derivatives; prediction markets are popular, so they enter prediction markets. In my view, this is not the case. CFO Haas put it bluntly: we are diversifying tradable asset classes so that no matter how the market rotates, we always have something users want to trade. The core of this statement is not chasing trends but hedging cycles. Coinbase’s biggest problem has never been technology but overreliance on spot trading volume for revenue—making a fortune in bull markets but crashing in bear markets. Armstrong wants to unify spot, perpetual contracts, futures, and options on one platform to provide deeper liquidity. This is not chasing the hype; it’s fixing a long-standing structural flaw. When the next bull market arrives and users flood in, they won’t be entering a platform that only trades $BTC but a comprehensive exchange where they can trade futures, bet on election outcomes, and buy gold contracts. With the entry point secured, users have more to do once inside, naturally increasing retention. What Armstrong is doing in this bear market is redefining what Coinbase will be for the next bull market. Do you think they’ve placed the right bet? 🤯

Not sure if everyone has noticed, but Planet quietly launched a block feature 🤓 Here's a demonstration for everyone (not actually planning to block 米花Lilac_OKX ) Friendly reminder: please update to the latest version

4🈷️<Key Information> Summary Interested friends can check the picture directly. Let's look forward to the new events happening in May $BTC #加密立法525：5月列入议程

It's almost here, it's Wednesday~ In the blink of an eye, it's the Wednesday that creators love ❤️ Just hold on for one more day, and then it's Labor Day holiday! What plans does everyone have?

#美司法部：不起诉加密开发者 The U.S. Department of Justice says: Writing code is not a crime~ but don't celebrate too early🤨 The acting U.S. Attorney General has officially stated: As long as you do not assist in criminal activity, cryptocurrency and blockchain developers will not face federal prosecution. Crypto developers can finally take their lawyers' numbers off speed dial😂 In fact, this statement can be translated to mean: Writing code itself is no longer an original sin. For those developers who were arrested for writing a privacy protocol or taken to court for creating a wallet tool, this statement comes a bit late, but at least it has arrived😮‍💨 👀 But one question remains unclear: Where is the line drawn for "not assisting in crime"? DeFi protocols are open; anyone can use them, including some projects with ulterior motives. Developers write code, deploy it on-chain, and then walk away, only to find out three months later that someone used this protocol to launder $200 million. Does this count as "assisting"❓ ➤ According to the new stance: No, as long as you did not actively cooperate. But how do you define "actively cooperate"? Does the protocol have a front end? Is there a blacklist? Has the team ever received a warning? Every detail could potentially become evidence in a future case. The progress of the law is real, but the gray areas are also real. This statement addresses the issue of "obviously innocent developers," but the boundaries for completely anonymous privacy infrastructure like Tornado Cash remain unanswered. It seems that this line can only be gradually clarified through real cases, using developers' freedom and legal fees to draw it clearly. Take a breath of relief, but don't delete your lawyer's number🫣